top of page

Understanding SB 741: Navigating Changes in Domestic Violence Restraining Orders

Empowering Victims and Advocates Through Legal Reform

In a significant development, the Governor signed SB 741 into law on October 8, 2023, ushering in changes to the landscape of domestic violence restraining orders in California. The legislation, which amends the Family Code by adding Section 6309, aims to address pressing issues related to domestic violence and court proceedings.

Legislative Intent and Background: SB 741 emphasizes the urgency of addressing domestic violence as a public safety and health crisis. The legislation recognizes the prevalence of intimate partner violence and the need for effective legal remedies to protect survivors. The intent is clear: to streamline the process of obtaining domestic violence restraining orders, preventing abusive litigation tactics that hinder the protection of survivors and their children.

Key Provisions of Family Code 6309: The core change introduced by SB 741 is the restriction on discovery pursuant to the Civil Discovery Act for domestic violence restraining orders. The default now prohibits discovery, requiring special court permission, and introduces specific considerations for the court when deciding on the request. The factors include the importance and relevance of the information sought, the potential for trauma, and the presence of restraining or protective orders.

Balancing Rights and Protection: While the legislation aims to protect survivors by expediting the adjudication of restraining orders, it raises questions about the accused's ability to present a defense. The requirement to demonstrate "good cause" for discovery and the limitation of discovery to the least intrusive methods may impact the accused's ability to challenge accusations effectively.

Concerns and Considerations: The shift in the discovery process prompts reflection on the broader implications for the adversarial system. The legislative intent, while focused on protecting survivors, may inadvertently limit the accused's fundamental rights, especially when compared to criminal proceedings where discovery is a matter of course.


Professional Insight and Opinion on SB 741 and Family Code 6309 Modification: I feel compelled to share my perspective on SB 741 and its impact on the modification of Family Code 6309. In my view, this statute represents a heavy-handed, overreaching correction to a problem that could have been addressed differently, with less sacrifice of fundamental rights.


The importance of obtaining evidence to disprove or contradict statements in a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) request cannot be overstated. Fundamental rights are at stake, as DVROs become a part of your permanent record, influencing one's movement, interactions with law enforcement, and custodial rights. While the imperative to protect victims of abuse is undeniable, we must equally safeguard against false allegations. It is worth noting that any discovery process will inevitably be distressing for an accuser if it serves to impeach their credibility by revealing falsehoods. If the concern was about potential abuse of discovery, the Civil Discovery Act already includes provisions for protective orders. A judicious application of these orders would address any issues without necessitating a sweeping change in the law that risks limiting constitutional rights to due process.


While it's acknowledged that DV victims can suffer re-abuse through prolonged litigation of DVRO petitions and experience financial harm, attributing blame solely to the accused is a simplistic view. Protracted litigation often results from judicial processes that fail to control the proceedings, grant protective orders promptly, expedite DVRO trials as required by law, award sanctions when warranted, or provide need-based fees at the start of the case.


If any aspect warrants review, it should be the mechanisms for holding judicial officers accountable for their failure to uphold and enforce existing laws. Addressing these issues, rather than a broad legislative overhaul, would likely yield a more effective and balanced approach to addressing concerns within the system.


In navigating these changes, it becomes crucial for legal practitioners and individuals involved in family law matters to stay informed. SB 741 represents a significant shift in the approach to domestic violence restraining orders, emphasizing the need for expedited protection while raising important questions about due process.


For those seeking legal advice or assistance in understanding the implications of SB 741 on their specific situations, our legal team is here to help. Contact us to schedule a consultation and ensure your rights and interests are appropriately represented in light of these legislative changes.


Channe G. Coles

Family Law Attorney

74 views0 comments


bottom of page